

It was big news when Nine Inch Nails mastermind Trent Reznor broke ties with long time label Interscope Records (owned by Universal Music Group) after the release of “Year Zero Remixed” in 2007. In an interview with the Australian newspaper The Herald Sun in May 2007, Reznor described his distaste for the major labels and their actions. He recounted how he had entered an HMV in Sydney only to find that his band’s new album was priced $10 to $15 more than most other releases. He told the paper that in a conversation with a label rep about the situation he was told, “basically it’s because we know you’ve got a core audience that’s gonna buy whatever we put out, so we can charge more for that. It’s the pop stuff we have to discount to get people buy it. True fans will pay whatever”.
Continue reading ‘Breaking New Ground: The Nine Inch Nails Approach To The Music Industry’
In a recent post (February 24, 2009) the unorthodox marketing initiative of artist Josh Freese was discussed in detail. The following is an e-mail sent directly from Josh Freese to Bob Lefsetz (famous for his career spent as an American entertainment lawyer/author of “The Lefsetz Letter”/majordomo of Sanctuary Music’s American division) that Lefsetz published in one of his many “mailbag” posts on April 11, 2009. Here Freese discusses the results of his unique approach thus far:
One of the most consistently debated and pondered over topics proliferating the conversations of the industry these days is the importance of the record label. Do artists still need them? Can you succeed without one? Whose interests do they have in mind? If you look back at the previous entries on this site you will see that there is a lengthy discussion on the position of labels in the current market. Rather than reiterate what has been said earlier this is an opportunity to look at a few recent occurrences and make a few observations. 